Judge in Assange case EXPOSED, troubling new details emerge about his history

This is how ‘democracy’ dies—not at the Washington Post’s fancy, but due to the clear corruption, regulatory capture, and play-to-play politics that are destroying our Western societies from within.

(Article by Vince Quill republished from WLTReport.com)

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is currently facing extradition to the United States for his role in exposing the deep state.

We could call them extradition proceedings, but, in reality, Assange is essentially on trial for his life.

New, troubling details have emerged regarding the British judge overseeing the Assange extradition case.

According to sources, Justice Jeremey Johnson previously represented the British intelligence agency MI6 and the British Ministry of Defense as a private attorney.

These entities are the English equivalent of what we in the MAGA movement would call the deep state. Can Assange get a fair trial from a deep state clerk? Russell Brand and others asked the same question:

As it’s discovered that the judge set to rule on the Assange extradition case was previously paid to represent the interests of MI6 and the Ministry of Defence – whose activities WikiLeaks has exposed – what are the chances of a fair hearing for Julian Assange? pic.twitter.com/Yjlv8HJWwG

— Russell Brand (@rustyrockets) February 23, 2024

Zero Hedge shared this article from Consortium News, exposing Justice Jeremy Johnson:

As a barrister, in 2007 he represented MI6 as an observer during the inquests into the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed.

Johnson worked alongside Robin Tam QC, previously described by legal directories as a barrister who “does an enormous amount of often sensitive work” for the U.K. government.

At the time, Foreign Office sources could not recall “a previous occasion when MI6 [had] appointed lawyers to an inquest”.

Many decried Judge Johnson’s prior history and demanded that he recuse himself from the proceedings against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.

Call upon Justice Jeremy Johnson to recuse himself. He has a career of being an agent of the very corruption that Wikileaks was designed to reveal. #AssangeAppeal

— Andy Maidment (@Anders_Maidment) February 21, 2024

Julian Assange is not the only one on trial

The integrity and honesty of the UK Judiciary is also being judged …

https://t.co/r3Z4xKvrFr

The judge in the case against Julian Assange previously worked for MI6 and the Ministry of Defense – DeclassifiedUK . pic.twitter.com/W70hJMZF40

— The Unhappy PA (@c36812927) February 21, 2024

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW !!!!!!!
The judge set to rule on the Assange extradition case was previously paid to represent the interests of MI6 & the Ministry of Defence – whose activities WikiLeaks has exposed.
What Julian faces next is terrifying.
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW !!!!!!!

— Joseph Dickerson (@joekaren46) February 26, 2024

Chances of Julian Assange getting a fair trial sounds like zero. This needs alot more eyes. The Judge has a personal connection to the case. He should be expunged from this case and a new unbiased Judge should take over. This man is a hero. The least he could get is a fair trial. https://t.co/TB4PbVVY6P

— MemeHeardRoundTheWorld (@FreeStateOfMeme) February 23, 2024

Russia Today shared this statement from legendary, former Pink Floyd frontman Roger Waters regarding Johnson:

“These people don’t believe in the rule of law,” the legendary rocker continued, referring to senior judges Victoria Sharp and Jeremy Johnson, who will ultimately decide whether to grant Assange another appeal.

“They believe in the ruling class, and they believe they are servants of the ruling class. And they will do whatever they are told,” he declared.

“It’s becoming more and more transparent to we, the people…that they are full of s**t.”

Read more at: WLTReport.com