Mel Gibson sparks outcry over 9/11 ‘Biggest Scandal’ remark as unanswered questions resurface

The official story on 9/11 is fraught with inconsistencies, discrepancies, and questions unanswered. Acclaimed actor Mel Gibson is now calling 9/11 America’s “biggest scandal” as unanswered questions resurface.

Points to consider:

• The collapse of three World Trade Center buildings — despite only two being struck by planes — defied conventional explanations.
• The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) claims Building 7 collapsed because of office fires, but its freefall-like descent over 100 feet remains unexplained in peer-reviewed science.
• NIST’s office fire theory lacks empirical evidence, as aerial footage shows no intense fires in WTC 7’s upper floors to account for its structural failure.
• Engineers from the global coalition Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth argue fires cannot explain rapid steel frame collapses of such magnitude.
• NIST used unverified computer simulations instead of testing explosive residue or recovering critical building components.
• Polls show 30% of Americans distrust the official 9/11 narrative, highlighting persistent public skepticism.
• WTC 7’s collapse signature matches characteristics of controlled demolitions, including symmetrical disintegration and tall dust plumes.
• Former Rep. Curt Weldon claims the CIA and media suppress scrutiny of 9/11, dismissing critics as “conspiracy theorists” to shield institutional ineptitude.
• The 9/11 Commission dismissed the possibility of insider involvement, despite acknowledging U.S. counterterrorism failures prior to 2001.

Mel Gibson speaking up about 9/11 scandal

Mel Gibson, a Trump-aligned Hollywood star known for mega-hits like The Passion of the Christ, has ignited renewed public debate over 9/11’s “biggest scandal,” demanding answers into lingering anomalies. On Tuesday, the actor posted a clip of former Republican Rep. Curt Weldon questioning the 2001 attacks’ official narrative, asserting, “Three buildings collapsed as if programmed,” and branding the issue “the biggest scandal” in U.S. history.

Gibson’s X post on Tuesday, paired with Weldon’s Fox News interview on Monday, highlights an increasingly vocal verdict: America’s 3,000 lives lost on 9/11 remain overshadowed by unanswered questions about how — and why — three skyscrapers collapsed on a single day.

Gibson’s intervention underscores a growing credibility crisis in institutional storytelling. “What really happened that day? Why is no one allowed to talk about it?” he demanded, adding, “Enough with the fear. It’s time for the truth.” His challenge loops in rare political space, linking himself to activists like Richard Gage of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, whose “Explosive Evidence” documentaries detail suspected controlled demolitions in the Twin Towers and WTC 7’s midday implosion at 5:20 p.m., absent any aircraft strike.

Weldon’s interview logged a damning critique of government secrecy. When reporters dismiss critics as “conspiracy theorists,” he fired back: “That’s all the CIA does! They’re the ones creating conspiracies. They teach agents how to make people look like liars.” He urged President Trump to appoint an independent commission of “people of impeccable integrity” to conduct a factual audit — not tying their findings to political leanings.

From the World Trade Center ruins to today’s truth crisis

The stakes transcend historical curiosity. According to NIST, Building 7’s collapse — a 6.5-second “near freefall” descent — was caused solely by fires ignited by debris. Yet forensic analyses show those fires were moderate, confined to a single floor near ground level, far from the building’s core. Even NIST’s 2008 report admitted structural failure beyond fire models, yet officials still dismiss calls to test for explosive residues or interview non-government mechanical engineers.

Meanwhile, a frame-by-frame analysis of WTC 7’s collapse demonstrates symmetric floor-by-floor dismantling—a signature of controlled demolition—to which NIST offers no peer-reviewed rebuttal.

The political climate fuels the malaise. The 9/11 Commission—a Congressionally mandated body—concluded “no inside job,” but admitted the FBI and CIA ignored 60+ red flags linking Al-Qaeda to U.S. soil prior to 2001. Yet whistleblowers alleging classified foreknowledge face careers in ruins—as sawed Janette Francesulleto, the then-Secretary of State’s intel analyst, for flagging “black flights” on 9/11.

NaturalNews has long documented how centralized media demonize skeptical citizens while excusing official secrecy. The ongoing tragedy isn’t just about unanswered questions—it’s about a culture extinguishing dissent.

“The official story of 9/11 is trembling like the Twin Towers themselves,” says Weldon. If avian species signal ecosystems’ health, then Gibson’s bold address—paired with a 30% public dissident cohort—reveals the fragility of institutional legitimacy. As nations worldwide confront destabilizing misinformation, the U.S.’s failure to address its own shadow questions risks calcifying its role as a global center of conspiracy, rather than the truth.

Sources include:

RT.com

Enoch, Brighteon.ai

FBI.gov